Font
Large
Medium
Small
Night
Prev Index    Favorite Next

One forty zero:

140:

"I don't think Doug Rachel is a good role model and good player. I think many people think so, but sadly, a recent poll showed that teenagers in the United States who like Doug Rachel actually accounted for 70%, while only 25% of the people who hate it. Oh my God, is America going to fall? How could anyone like that villain, that uneducated guy, who likes to expose his lower body to everyone? Do those teenagers like Doug Rachel's complicated sex postures? If this is true, I can't see the future path of the American nation. As for Doug Rachel being a good player, it's even more a joke. I don't understand what those former basketball superstars like Doug Rachel? In addition to the failure of the board shooting, will he attack other than other attacks?

?Does he have other defensive methods besides malicious fouls on the court? Oh, he also has noisy trash words and hidden little moves. Don't tell me that he led the team to a reversal victory yesterday, that's just luck! For the explanation of that weird three-pointer, I can only use God to nap at that time to explain. As for the block, it's even more funny. I looked at the videotape carefully. Before he blocked Robert's shot, he had at least three or four fouls, among which the foul that pushed Tim Duncan was the most obvious. I don't know why the referee didn't call that foul? Could it be that Doug Rachel is really David Stern's long-lost son? Sorry, David, I can't think of any other reason to convince myself!" - This article is excerpted from the commentary article of the well-known Rachel Blackfegan.

As soon as Feigan's article was released, it immediately caused a huge response. Large-scale teenagers began to boycott Feigan spontaneously. Some extreme teenagers even used his hacking technology to hack Feigan's computer and left such a line on it - you don't have to worry about the future of America, your mouth is as funny as your genitals!

Fagan did not pursue this. When he was interviewed, he pretended to be a saint: they were just some young people who were not very experienced, so I chose to forgive them!

In addition, Rachel's supporters, led by villains such as Barkley Rodman, also formed a group to fight back. Barkley said bluntly: I don't think those who just rely on pens to comment on basketball can experience the passion on the field, which is as funny as a sexual incompetent person saying that he can experience orgasm. In addition, I think Doug Rachel's genitals are as charming as his butt, and that's a big guy, and I even feel a little inferior about it.

Bill Walton: Michael once pushed Russell away the final shot, so I don't think there is any problem with the referee's decision, because at that moment, the game should be decided by the players themselves, rather than the annoying whistle! As for Doug Rachel's nude photo incident, I don't make any comments, but I want to say, everyone has the years of youth and frivolity.

Dennis Rodman: Fagan, show your genitals bravely. If yours is bigger than Doug Rachel, then you are qualified to criticize him. If not, shut up!

Oakley: He doesn't understand basketball!

Larry Johnson: Ball blind!

After a group of villain players made a series of declarations to support dogs, for a while, the dogs and the dogs had debates again and again through various media.

But soon, the debate took a one-sided trend because the basketball god Michael Jordan spoke.

"Doug Rachel is a good defensive player, but he is not a good idol. He shouldn't post his nude photos online because it will have a bad impact on teenagers."

The God of Basketball criticized Doug Rachel. These people who were inverted dogs immediately stood on the commanding heights of morality and besieged the people who supported the dogs. Fortunately, the people who supported the dogs were all rebellious young people, and they didn't take authority seriously. They still resisted, but they lost a little in momentum.

As soon as Jordan said this, major media immediately quoted it, and the more it was induced, it became more and more outrageous. In the end, it turned into a rumor that the god of basketball believes that Doug Rachel is a shame in the basketball world.

Originally, this incident could not cause any storm. It was just that a god in the basketball world criticized a junior, but this junior was not an ordinary person, but Doug Rachel. So when Doug Rachel was interviewed, he responded with this sentence: "My brother is a fan of Michael Jordan. Now he is gambled and prostituted, and he likes to play baseball! Of course, he is still my brother."

Rachel’s implication is very obvious. You, Jordan, are not clean, why should you take care of me?

Although Rachel meant this, the media didn't think so. They once again put the big hat of disrespectful basketball gods on a rookie's head, the last one was Allen Iverson.

Rachel was really not afraid of this hat, so he publicly retorted: Yes, some of my pictures did circulate online, but everyone has to do it. I just made my life public. Doesn’t Michael Jordan have to live a sex life? Even if US President Bush, he has to live a sex life!

As soon as Rachel's remarks came out, they immediately became the focus of public opinion. The media once again demonized Rachel, even if he was already demonized enough. Doug Rachel was described by them as a villain who disrespects the god of basketball, who is promiscuous, rebellious, vicious, and unqualified.

Under their intensive publicity, almost no one in the United States does not know who Doug Rachel is? And the people who black Doug Rachel continue to be black, and those who support Doug Rachel continue to be black. The people who make money in the middle are David Stern, the old man and Doug Rachel himself. Maybe this is the so-called blessing of losing his fortune!

However, it is interesting that Rachel's two consecutive counterattacks did not arouse Michael Jordan's criticism again. Although the reporter put a lot of effort into this and used all the things that could be used to sow discord, Jordan remained silent on this issue.

A few years later, Rachel and Jordan met at a commercial cocktail party. Jordan explained the whole story and made Rachel laugh. The reason why Michael Jordan criticized Rachel was that when he didn't knock on the door and walked into his youngest son's room that day, he found that his youngest son was shooting a pistol in Doug Rachel's nude photo!

So when he was angry, he criticized Doug Rachel, a "junior in the field of love" in the interview the next day, regardless of his previous bad behavior!

Of course, if the reporter knew about this news, I would be afraid that it would be hotter because it sounded more exciting and erotic...
Chapter completed!
Prev Index    Favorite Next