Therefore, if the superiors are determined to solve the Taiwan issue in the short term, we don’t have to worry about letting the Taiwanese military personnel understand the reality of our army. Now our army’s absolute strength can only make them even more panic, and in the short term they are simply unable to narrow this huge gap.

After the new draft plan was revised, Chief No. 1 brought out the General Staff’s plan for discussion by the Politburo. As expected, no one had much opinion on other aspects. It was nothing more than an optional plan. We try to use moderate means to solve the problem. Why not do it?

However, when it comes to giving a seat for the Politburo, there are a bit of a big difference between this seat. If this seat is not enough, the Politburo has more than 20 positions, and a seat is at most a symbolic meaning. However, this symbolic meaning has caused the conservative members to have some questions about the direction of the governance of the No. 1 leader.

In their opinion, this is a dangerous signal and a destruction of our dictatorship system. If we simply want to improve the political status of Taiwan, even if we give a current vice chairman of the CPPCC, the vice chairman of the National People's Congress and even the vice chairman of the country, it can be discussed, but the Politburo's core decision-making circle has entered an alien, which is really a lot of imagination.

What's more, the head of Hong Kong Island may also have this qualification after the news is released. So today may be one seat, and will it become three seats or five seats tomorrow or in the future? This is a big problem.

Therefore, more than one-third of the members strongly opposed this suggestion. This sign that threatens the entire system cannot be opened easily. Otherwise, once this head starts, it is really hard to say that it cannot be stopped after being received. The lessons of Gorbachev are not far away. Among the people present, the strongest opposer mentioned this matter to the table in a blunt manner.

In party affairs, Chief No. 1 has great authority, but it is handled internal affairs. Many of them have conventions and regulations. No matter how they make decisions, they will not endanger the operation of the entire system. Therefore, everyone respects the decisions of Chief No. 1. Even if most things are controversial, Chief No. 1 can be decided by one word after communication.

However, like today, people cannot let No. 1 act arbitrarily.

The meeting was quarreled for a day without a final result. Seeing that everyone rebounded so fiercely, the No. 1 leader was also a little surprised. Although this proposal was a little radical in his opinion, there was no essential change. He also heard the doubts of his opponents, whether this would be a multi-party system.

Although the No. 1 leader flatly denied this view, it must be qualified as the head of the SAR, not as a party, because the head of the SAR can be a certain party or a non-party, which depends on the choice of the people in the SAR. As long as it is not opposed to the Basic Law of the SAR, the central government can accept it. The local government autonomy of the SAR is very sufficient.

Therefore, in the view of Chief No. 1, giving the head of the SAR a chance to join the core decision-making power is an initiative to achieve limited and transparent decision-making. It has nothing to do with the multi-party system, and his own comrades are too sensitive.
Chapter completed!