The grading work is all in order, and under the current system, the probability of making mistakes is not high.

There are tables arranged neatly in the room, and each row can seat three people.

The first person on the left will start the first review, then it will be handed over to the second person on the right for review, and finally it will be reviewed by the third person.

When the three people come to the same conclusion, the assistant official will take the test paper back to the first person and seal it for final confirmation.

Then three people stamped their names one by one to confirm. When the stamps of the three people's names are stamped, it means that the grading work of this test paper has been completed.

It also means that there will no longer be any problems with this paper.

Unless the standard answer given above is wrong.

After the review was completed here, someone began to take the paper and send it to the next room for another half-page review. At the same time, the half-reviewed paper over there was brought here for review.

The two houses are cross-checked, and only one test paper is considered completed.

After a paper is reviewed, it will be sent to another scoring office for final scoring statistics.

The verification also needs to be completed by three people. The first time is calculation, and the second and third time are review.

More importantly, the test papers are anonymous.

In other words, no one knows which paper belongs to whom until all papers are finally reviewed.

Once again, the possibility of cheating in grading has been eliminated through the system.

Although random allocation has avoided this phenomenon to the greatest extent, there are always surprises in everything.

And under this system now, take this imperial examination distance.

There are eight papers in total for a complete paper. Forty-eight people are needed to review and review the eight papers alone, and three people are needed to score. Including the final paper summarization, the total score totals three people.

In other words, a paper needs to pass through the hands of fifty-five people.

There are fifty-five names printed on the back alone.

With such a complex and strict system, the probability of errors is minimized.

Compared to how busy the others were, Chen Ping, Xiao He, and Guan Ying were a little leisurely.

They don't need to read every paper.

As the chief reviewers, the three of them only need to review the policy papers with the highest scores.

If you have nothing to do, you can check any paper at any time.

Of course, according to this year's rules, the three of them need to review no less than 200 papers during this marking period.

Of course, this also includes the papers that they should review.

Chen Ping picked up a paper that had just been reviewed by three people and looked at the scores given by the three judges.

The first trial is worth ten points, the second trial is twelve points, and the third trial is eleven points.

The differences between the three judges are not big, and it is normal for them to be one or two points different from each other. It is impossible to give the same score for policy analysis.

Similarly, the two subsequent reviews of the policy are not focused on whether there were errors in the first review.

But policy theory is really not easy for him to talk about, and it is also where problems are most likely to arise.

Therefore, the three judges need to abandon the previous scores and give the scores they think are appropriate according to their own senses.

The scores given by the three judges are then added together and divided by three to arrive at an average score.

This average score is the final score of this piece of strategy.

Of course, if you encounter a highly controversial policy paper, for example, if there is a five-point difference between the lowest score and the highest score, it must be sent to three chief judges for a final decision.

After all, a policy paper is only worth twenty-five points. A difference of five points is equivalent to a one-fifth difference.

If this is not determined by the presiding judge, once the papers are released, it will inevitably cause huge controversy.

Looking at the high-scoring strategy theory in his hand, which had been deducted 14 points, Chen Ping was also very curious, wondering which god's work this was?

Anyway, since the inception of the imperial examination, Chen Ping has never heard of anyone losing more than half of his points in the policy analysis process.

Of course, it’s not that there is nothing, it’s just a direct zero score.

Obviously, policy theory is a key point for getting points. If you want to rank high in the imperial examination, you must get high scores for policy theory.

Not to mention twenty-five points, it must be at least twenty points.

Because only in this way can we stably enter the next stage, or even enter the final palace examination stage.

Chen Ping first focused on the conclusions given by the three judges.

I found that the conclusions given by the three reviewers were surprisingly consistent. Although the words were different, the meanings were the same.

To sum it up in one sentence, the content is impetuous, lacks basic data, and seriously deviates from reality.

To sum it up, I mean.

This god's policy was completely based on his own imagination and was fabricated out of thin air, without considering the actual situation at all. It was like a person who didn't understand anything but was bragging.

Of course, what really attracted Chen Ping was the last sentence. The idea has certain reference value.

It was precisely because of the existence of this last sentence that Chen Ping understood why the three judges did not directly give zero points when they made such comments.

Although you are bragging, I think your ideas can be used as a reference, so I give you a consolation point.

Now Chen Ping became even more curious, so he began to read this immortal's masterpiece seriously.

The policy discussion is not long, only two pieces of paper, and the rule is that it cannot exceed two pieces of paper at most.

Under the premise that the length is limited, if you want to highlight your article, you must make certain choices and compress certain parts.

This is a test of a person's skill. If you press too hard, the article will look unreliable. If you press too little, it will make people feel too scattered and without any useful information.

However, within a moment, Chen Ping frowned and put down the policy.

"Boy, I saw an interesting article. Come and take a look!" Chen Ping took the paper and walked back to the presiding position, handing the paper to Xiao He and Guan Ying.

"You found a problem as soon as you got down?" Xiao He glanced at the score given on the paper.

The average score was eleven points, but Chen Ping said it was an interesting article.

If it was boring, Chen Ping would naturally not take this paper back.

It's not like Xiao He has never reviewed papers before, so he naturally knows that papers like this are the most difficult to review.

Because the three reviewers of this year's policy are composed of two ministers and a minister.

Opinions may differ, but the three of them gave almost the same score, which probably means there is something wrong with this article.

But this kind of thing doesn’t seem like it should happen.

The three judges are all experienced officials and it is impossible for them to be confused at the same time.
Chapter completed!