After thinking about it, I still wrote this single chapter to explain it for a long-term plan.

Actually, there is not much to explain. I saw some readers’ comments. I wanted to talk, but I didn’t dare to go to the laning because I knew it would be very troublesome to go to the laning.

I would just open a single chapter and say that I will only open this time and will never open again.

First of all, I thought about the title of quasi-general. This is a small bug, not a problem.

Secondly, some people say that I wrote pirates too badly.

This is my personal problem, it is my personal product.

If your actions do not constitute "evil", you don't have to use the name of pirate. If you use the name of pirate and you also agree that you are a pirate, there is actually no need to wash it.

To give a simple example, the Yellow Turban Army is called the Yellow Turban Thieves by others, but will the Yellow Turban Army itself say it is the Yellow Turban Thieves?

No, right.

The pirates in One Piece all call themselves pirates. They recognize that their identity is pirates, not just adventurers, nor are they kind people.

Their lowest bottom line is the bottom line of being the worst pirate, and the closer they get to that vicious bottom line, the more they fit the pirate we think.

Why are the Blackbeard Kaido and others the most pirate pirate among One Piece? Isn’t that because of this?

Luffy's group and some other groups that make people feel good are just a little far from the bottom line, but they are still pirates after all, and they are not considered good people.

Have you ever hurt innocent civilians when fighting? When fighting with the navy, have you never hurt the navy that killed the righteous?

It can't be said that the Navy is looking for them, right?

Who told them to say that they were pirates?

This is my own opposition to me, no wonder others are.

You can't let the Navy leave the pirates alone, so what is the chaos in One Piece world?

For example, a child who originally planned to live a good life was influenced by a certain pirate and decided to grow up and become a pirate. During the process of being a pirate, he did evil things and started to get out of control. Is the pirate who affects the child considered doing evil things?

Isn’t Luffy the one who was affected? If Shanks hadn’t had the deep influence on him, Luffy might have become the Navy King, right?

Based on the above reasons, pirates are not worthy of being called good people in my private goods.

The best thing is a selfish bastard who ignores others.

The so-called free thing you pursue is nothing more than not wanting to be bound.

However, freedom without restraint will inevitably lead to exploitation of the weak by the strong.

So people who write pirates too badly and absolutely, don’t talk about me, you are right.

Another thing is the problem with the book itself. The beginning of this book is my personal understanding of justice, and it is inevitable that I will have my personal information.

It may be in the same band as some people understand justice, so I am really sorry.

As for the writing style and plot, my brothers have no opinions on me. If I can change it, I can only say sorry for my fault.

I really make you angry. I wasted your time and wanted to squirt me. It’s not that bad, but I’m prone to breaking my defense. If your comments make me break my defense, I can’t help but delete it.

Look, you write a comment and want to say that I am writing trash, I'm breaking my defense, I'll delete your comment.

Your purpose of making me angry has been achieved, and I deleted your comment and I feel relieved.

So is it good to be a draw?
Chapter completed!