After the German 4-1 victory over England, the English media criticized the referee and reported the game to vent their dissatisfaction. Shubao.com.

The British "Guardian" electronic text broadcast the game live. The live broadcaster said: "England is paying off its debts for 1966! Lampard's long-range shot scored, and the ball passed the German goalkeeper Neuer on the head, hit the crossbar and bounced into the net, and then bounced out." The live broadcaster also exaggeratedly, "This ball crossed the goal line for a few miles. But it doesn't count! Lampard couldn't believe his eyes."

On July 30, 1966, the World Cup final staged by England and the Federal Republic of Germany started at Wembley. Within 90 minutes, the two teams fought 2-2. In the 101st minute of overtime, the most suspenseful goal in world football history appeared: Hurst shot hard, the ball hit the lintel and then hit the goal line and popped up...

At that time, assistant referee Bakhramov did not see whether the ball had crossed the goal line, but he signaled that the ball had crossed the goal line as a whole. Swiss referee Dinster announced the goal to be valid. In the end, with this goal, England continued to work hard and won the Remitt Golden Cup! However, this "ghost goal" became an eternal unsolved case in the history of world football. British media believe that this is also the unsolved case in England that was paying off the debt for the unsolved case 44 years ago.

The Sun said that the goal is not counted! Barry got the ball and passed it to Lampard. Lampard's long shot crossed the German goalkeeper, hit the crossbar and bounced into the goal net, but the referee did not judge the goal to be effective! It seemed that the ball had entered the goal line for a whole yard. I really don't know if Mr. Larryonda's eyes were different from others, or if he didn't see it at all?

Yahoo UK said: "England magically scored another goal! Lampard shot well! No! The referee's decision was invalid! Why?" The live broadcaster believed that it was obvious that the ball hit the crossbar and bounced down the goal line. It was so terrible, a terrible decision!

Although the English always believed that the referee ruined the game and completely changed the end of the game. But the Germans did not think so. In the German Biography, what they said: Not many people would have thought that the English-German battle actually scored a 4-1 high score. Under the crazy crushing of the German tanks, England lost one and was distracted, and the Lions were gone. The linebacker Pablo Fantino did not see clearly that the goal scored by Lampard's goal across the goal line was purely a failure, but looking at the whole game, the German team was more qualified to win. Their blitz completely disrupted the opponent's defensive deployment. By the end of the battle, England had almost given up.

From Gong Zheng's magical goal at the beginning to Ozil's cross-border end Thomas Mueller's push to the end of the empty goal, this undoubtedly does not mean that the Germans performed better than the English.

From blitzkrieg to counterattack, the German team was very familiar with it. If the powerful Gong Zheng sounded the offensive horn for the team with his outstanding sense of smell in front of the goal, the mature Mueller used the flash counterattack to kill England.

The referee ruined Lampard's goal and indirectly pushed England into the abyss, but misjudgment in this game was not the only factor that determined the game. The German team obviously played better than England. They not only could adjust their formation according to the situation on the field, but also went straight to Huanglong with simple, direct and sharp cooperation. The victory of the German team was the victory of the team. England lost due to lack of preparation and lack of response, and they paid a high price for their shortcomings.

The Italians turned their attention to the referee of the game, La Leonda. Italy's "Roman Sports" reported: "The appearance of La Leonda with a strong record should have been a mistake!"

They said in the article: Although in today's game, there was almost no sign of La Lyonda on the field, and his penalty did not cause any other disputes, even so, La Lyonda became the "striking figure" of this game.

The referee from Uruguay is known for his bad temper. At the age of 38, he was also famous for his "black whistle" incident. In 2002, he was revoked from his law enforcement qualification for the South Korea-Japan World Cup because he was investigated by the Uruguayan Football Association and was found to be blowing the "black whistle". At the 2006 German World Cup, he showed three red cards in the match between the United States and Italy.

What is most praised in La Lyonda's coaching career is that in a match between Brazil and Uruguay in 2004, Uruguay had a goal that had been out of bounds for half a meter, but La Lyonda's "patriotism" was extremely strong, and he turned a blind eye and did not give up the penalty. In addition, it is said that in the 2003 South American Club Cup, he showed six red cards in a game. It can be seen that such a "criminal" referee was selected as a law enforcement team in the South African World Cup, which is a great irony for FIFA.

The game has ended, but the doubts have not stopped. It seems that La Lyonda will be nailed to the pillar of shame in World Cup history before these people will stop.

Just as people's waves were heard, the match between Argentina and Mexico began, and the pressure on the referees in this game should be very high. Because the media and fans expressed dissatisfaction with the referees in this game, because the misjudgment of the British-German battle was not the only misjudgment in this game, so the referees in this game were very high.

Perhaps it was crushed by huge pressure, and the referees who enforced the game Argentina and Mexico again made huge misjudgments.

Although FIFA repeatedly stated that the referees in this World Cup have done a very good job, it cannot be denied that in the two finals held on June 27, the referees' penalty was obviously wrong.

Just two and a half hours later, the referee made a fatal mistake in the match between England and Germany and Lampard, in the game against Mexico, the referee Italian Rossetti also made a fatal mistake. He punished Tevez's first goal to be valid, and the goal of "Beast" was actually obviously offside first.

The Argentina team's attack was very fast this time. Messi made a deep pass in front of the penalty area. Mexican goalkeeper Perez attacked and hit the ball out of Tevez's feet. The ball returned to Messi's feet again. The "little flea" passed the ball again. When he passed it, it can be seen from the screenshots of the game video that Tevez was obviously in an offside position. At this time, the goalkeeper was already near the penalty spot. Two Mexican defenders were in front of Tevez, and the "Beast" was on the edge of the small penalty area. There was no Mexican player behind him. Messi passed the ball, and no one interfered with Tevez. The latter easily headed the ball into the goal, and Argentina took a 1-0 lead.

The assistant referee did not raise the flag, and the referee also made the penalty effective, which made the Mexican players angry. They surrounded the referee and the assistant referee, but after communicating with the assistant referee, the Italian referee Rossetti believed that the ball was not offside. It seemed that there were some questions for a few seconds. The players explained and the referee also discussed it, but in the end the Argentine still got a happy start. Rossetti confirmed the goal was valid, and the Argentine took the first step to the quarterfinals.

Mexican media reported that Mexican players saw a large screen replay on the field, and the assistant referee also saw it, but nothing was helpful.

In the end, Argentina defeated Mexico 3-1 and successfully reached the quarterfinals, becoming the fourth team to enter the quarterfinals in this World Cup.

Yes, in this way, the Mexican was as unlucky as the Englishman and was directly "blacked" by the referee.

After the game, the Mexican media expressed their injustice and strongly condemned the referee. They even reported such a news: Argentina won three misjudgments in four games and helped them, and fifa led them to win the championship?

Mexican media listed the basis in their reports: On June 27, the goal with a foul was judged to be valid, and the obvious offside was considered successful, and not once, it was Argentina's advance to the quarterfinals twice, four games, and three times benefiting from the referee's "noble help". Ma Dashuai has two invisible hands behind him?

The initial controversy of referees in this game was from Argentina against Nigeria. In the game, Argentina's Heinze scored a header, but Samuel made a foul in the penalty area at the time, and FIFA admitted that this was a misjudgment after the game. Even so, the penalty on the field was the final judgment and could not be reversed. Because of this goal, the "African Eagles" Nigeria team lost a good game and swallowed the bitter fruit of zero-to-one defeat. What's worse, this misjudgment also caused the eagle to break its wings and was eventually eliminated in the group stage.

This is just the beginning of the referee's care for Argentina, but it is definitely not the end. In the second game of the group stage, Argentina played against South Korea. In the 31st minute of the second half, after Messi hit the post, Higuain scored a goal. In fact, this was an offside. After the game, the assistant referee on duty even apologized. With this goal and the psychological gap between the South Korean team, Argentina finally won the game, laying the foundation for the situation of qualifying in the group.

This game was the third game for Argentina to be clearly cared for by the referee. In the first twenty minutes of the game, the Mexican team's offense was significantly stronger than Argentina. Once the shot hit the goal frame, and the other time was also slipped past the goal. However, in the 26th minute of the game, the situation changed suddenly due to the referee's performance. Argentina launched an attack in the middle. Messi, who was suspected of offside, broke through and shot was blocked by the Mexican goalkeeper. When the Argentine players passed the ball into the penalty area again, Argentine striker Tevez, who was offside for more than one meter, sent the ball into the empty goal.

Although the Mexican players protested with the referee and the linebacker, the referee and the linebacker still insisted on the wrong penalty and determined that the ball was valid. This cowardly conceding caused the Mexican players to be excited. A defender actually passed the ball to the feet of the Argentine team Higuain while passing the ball and was attacked by him to score a goal. During the half-time break, the Mexican players and the Argentine players almost had a group fight.

In the second half, Mexico's offense was quite threatening. After several shots were destroyed, the young player Hernandez finally scored a goal, but this was no longer enough to reverse the situation. In the end, they swallowed the bitter fruit of the loss one to three and were controversially eliminated.

Since the opening of this World Cup, it seems that only one team in Argentina has been clearly taken care of by the referee, but not many obviously unfavorable punishments. After Maradona became the head coach of the Argentina team, Argentina has become the star team in this World Cup. I wonder if it is because of the guarantee of box office of Ma Dashuai and Messi for longer, so there are so many referees who have helped?

After such obvious misjudgments within a day, FIFA's work attitude was questioned. These frequent referee problems are definitely a bitter irony to FIFA staff, because they repeatedly emphasized that the refereeship in this World Cup was done well!

ps: Thank you for the reward of [space line] for children's shoes, thank you very much!
Chapter completed!