.When the external teaching group of Central University disbanded, the students bid farewell to each other and began their own summer plans. There were actually no people who planned to go back to their hometown to get married, but there were many young students who planned to get married. This is because the butterfly of the Party Patriotic Kingdom... No, it should be considered the legendary giant bird, Dapeng. He, a sacred bird that was thousands of miles wide on his back, flapping his wings desperately, almost scattering the entire history beyond recognition.

The reason why there is a wave of students getting married is not to catch up with trends like "My Wife Is a High School Student" or "My Husband Is a College Student". One of the important reasons for this situation is that the fact that various aristocratic families tried their best to obtain recommended admissions from Central University.

If you want to get such a place, you naturally have to pay the corresponding benefits. Giving money? That is the stupidest thing.

First of all, the value of this recommended quota cannot be defined. If you buy it with money, it will hurt too much, but it can be tolerated, but if you give it less, it will be troublesome.

Why is it troublesome if you give it less? Of course, it is because the people who have recommended quotas are all students of the Party God. When everyone recognizes the value of the recommended quotas, they find that they have lost money. Do you think he can't secretly hate the family that took advantage of him? In the end, even if you give him money, you may not be able to get much. At most, you will have both wealth and money, and no one will take advantage of anyone.

Another point is that if you can sell this quota just because of money, you will probably have a bad character and your brain will not be smart enough. If you don’t have enough money to provide him or just right, he will probably not be able to balance his mind and he will have to speak greedily. If you make up too much, then this recommended quota will not be so cost-effective.

What's more, using money to measure the value of this quota, wouldn't it be too much to underestimate the students of the Party Gods?

Secondly, spending huge amounts of money to buy a place is also very risky. This is not to say that they have any questions about the "art of immortals" taught by the Gang Shenxian. If they had them, they would not be so apt to get a recommended place. Their concern is, what should they do if the Gang Shenxian suddenly left again on one day?

When the gods leave, their investment will be wasted. More importantly, the strength of the party gods after the arrival of the gods is, even if they did not see it with their own eyes, they can find out clearly. There is no doubt that the strong people's thighs are easy to hug. But the problem is that the strong people suddenly left quietly, just like he came quietly, and even waved his sleeves without taking away a cloud. Then the people who hugged their thighs before will be waxed, and it would be strange if they were not excluded by the emperor and other families.

Therefore, the best way to get recommended admissions from Central University is to get married. After marrying a daughter with a rich dowry, it actually doesn't cost much money for wealthy families. Their investment is no longer money, but kinship and family background.

Being able to become a family in the noble family is very attractive to many families. Didn’t even He Jin want to marry his daughter to the chief secretary Wang Qian and become a stepmother for Wang Can? Although He Jin wants to win over Wang Qian, he also uses the title of "Three Dukes in the Years" of Wang Qian’s family to enhance his status as a butcher’s relative.

This will become more obvious during the Jin Dynasty. In principle, the Nine-grade Zhongzheng system is based on the conduct of conduct. Family background is only used as a reference, but in the end it becomes a situation where the grade is completely determined by family background. Those who come from poor families have high moral comments, they can only be ranked at the lowest level; those who come from wealthy families have poor moral standards and poor moral standards. This is the so-called "there is no poor family, and no gentry is no longer the same."

Moreover, the method of getting married has a little benefit - or "unspoken rule": at a critical moment, sacrificing a daughter and sacrificing a family without any foundation is not a big deal. The dirty and cold-blooded nature of the aristocratic families in this regard is something that ordinary people can never imagine.

For the benefit of our family, what is a mere woman? Just like "marriage" and using women to exchange for peace, as long as it is beneficial to the country - or to those in power, what is a woman? When you don't want to fight, just send a woman to you. When you want to fight, you can start fighting immediately, and don't worry about the life or death of the woman you sent before. With such cheap and easy-to-use political means, why not?

The in-laws, which only have "relationships" but lack blood ties, can only become a bond of cooperation and mutual trust between two families with equal strength, but cannot become a reason for the two families with great strength to share weal and woe. In the final analysis, the two families can cooperate because of their respective strengths, not some insignificant in-laws. The so-called "husband and wife are birds in the same forest, and they fly together when the disaster strikes", let alone so many birds in the two families?

Of course, when both sides still need to cooperate, no one will come up with this unspoken rule. Even if it really reaches that point, this unspoken rule can only be discussed within one's own home, but it only needs to be done and not said to the outside world. But whether you have this spectrum in your heart, whether you have this understanding in your mind, and whether you have this awareness in your mind, but whether you have this consciousness in your mind, is one of the most important reasons for dividing aristocratic families that can last for thousands of years and a nouveau riche who has only been rich for three generations.

At the level of family, it is already the same as the country. It is the most undesirable to act emotionally. "The state has national laws, and the family has family rules." This "family" does not refer to an ordinary family, but a large family with its own inheritance and rigorous family rules.

Moreover, compared with the empire where the emperor is in power, although the administrative efficiency of the families in which the elders and heads of the family are relatively low, the political system is more reasonable and more in line with the democracy of a few people or even the democracy of a majority. Even if it is difficult for them to do the best, at least it is difficult for them to do the worst.

It is precisely because of this that there is no thousand-year-old dynasty in the world, but there are thousands-year-old families. Those who think that China has never had democracy are not clear that the great families in China have always adopted this advanced democratic political system.

The feudal patriarchal system that is still criticized by aristocratic families is actually equivalent to the "democratic centralism" in the feudal period: it has the advantages of democracy, and everyone decides the direction of the family's progress, and the advantages of concentration. The final resolution is handed over to the highest leader to organize and implement. This is a combination of centralization based on democracy and democracy under centralized guidance, which unexpectedly fits the most advanced political system in later generations.

The so-called democracy is not originally a kind of fooling the people like "the people are the masters of the country", but refers to a system that jointly handles affairs within a certain class sphere according to the principle of equality and minority obeying the majority. In fact, those who actually hold power are still aristocratic families who have a large number of means of production, and never include any ordinary people. As long as the people are obediently "represented" and work for them while daydreaming that they are the "masters".

Then the larger the scope of democracy, the more wise the decisions you make? Obviously not. Or on the contrary, when most people’s qualities are not high enough, the larger the scope of democracy, the lower the average quality of the decisive person, and the easier it is to make simple, eager for quick success and instant benefits.

If the democracy of a few people and the comprehensive IQ of the decisive person is like a dolphin, it is a very smart animal, then the democracy of the decisive person and the comprehensive IQ of the decisive person becomes a fish. The democracy of all people and the comprehensive IQ of the decisive person becomes a shrimp.

Although dolphins don’t see that far from their interests, they are already one of the smartest animals. Although fish are not smart enough, they can at least learn from past experiences and lessons and stay away from danger. Among them, cunning fish that are outstanding will eat the bait but do not bite the hook. However, shrimps basically only have biological instincts. When they see the bait, they will swallow it first without hesitation. If you describe a romantic relationship, "a man chasing a woman is like fishing, and a woman chasing a man is like fishing shrimp." This is the reason.

Those who hand over power to all people will definitely not be as corrupt as they are now, those in power will definitely not be as stupid as they are now, and the country will definitely not be on the wrong path as they are now, and those who are not of high quality will just yys who put gold on their faces.

People with a little political literacy will never think so - at most they will think that they may be able to do better, but this is only because of their irrationality as human beings. Fair and just selection procedures, scientific and effective organizational forms, legal system without human-set loopholes, violent organs that strictly abide by the law, and political system that allows everyone to supervise at any time is actually more important than who the official is.

Objectively speaking, elite politics is indeed better than mass politics where power is handed over to everyone. Not everyone can become elites—there are both external factors and ordinary people’s own factors. In other words, as long as it is a fair selection system, the comprehensive quality of the decision-making body composed of elites who have passed the selection must be higher than that of everyone, and the possibility of making wrong decisions is also lower.

The so-called democracy is actually such a thing. Although it does say that everyone should be in power and it can do this, after doing so, everyone will find that in the end, they have to hand over power to "elites" to "act on behalf of others". Because the flaw of the system of democracy itself is "democracy for all", it is more likely that most people make wrong decisions and bring everyone into the ditch - because sometimes the truth is indeed only in the hands of a few people.

Even if the "elites" have the personality weakness of ordinary people, then there is no need to even have the right to supervise - the decision made by the "elites" is theoretically the best decision among all people, then the existence of supervision can only give most ordinary people a means of replacing the best decision with less excellent or even completely wrong decisions.

This has nothing to do with the "scientific political system", it is purely using violence and people to act. In this case, there is no essential difference between humans and other creatures that rely on instinct to act. It is nothing more than that human intelligence is higher.
Chapter completed!