The update was interrupted in recent days because of my father's condition and it has nothing to do with the current contract dispute between China Literature.

To be honest, I know that this happened not long.

But since I know, I think I should talk about my position.

Free, I don't support it.

But I think it is understandable to explore innovative models.

Copyright, too much.

The author is not good at developing his own works with added value, which does not mean that he can be taken away for free.

This is a killing of creators' enthusiasm.

As the leader of online literature, if China Literature issues such a contract, other companies will inevitably not follow suit, which will cause distortion in the entire industry.

Without enthusiastic creators, the entire industry will become a stagnant pool.

Perhaps turning all online creators into code-word creators will help capital control the entire market, but it is not conducive to literary creation and social development.

I would like to borrow a sentence here: the fortune of literature is connected with the fortune of the country, and the tradition of literature is connected with the fortune of the country.

Capital requires benefits, and writers maintain dignity. This is not a single-choice question that is either one or the other, but can become a win-win existence.

I believe that the reasonable intervention of capital will make online literature more prosperous.

It can even influence the entire world, a brilliant stroke in the history of written literature.

And those who contribute to this achievement will not be forgotten.

As an online literature with a very low entry threshold, it has been slandered a lot in recent years.

But it is still growing stronger and has become an important carrier for carrying our country's excellent historical and cultural heritage. This is an undeniable fact.

Personally, online articles have changed my life.

As for the country, it may be an important channel for us to speak out.
Chapter completed!