Yes, the catheter for interventional surgery can only be placed at the proximal end of the ophthalmic artery for spraying or stenting. If these places are blocked, there is no need to say more. There is a chance to place the catheter and stent here, and the effect of thrombolysis is better.

The catheter and stent are limited by the diameter of the blood vessels that cannot be sent to the terminal blood vessels of the retinal. Only the thrombolytic drugs can be dissolved through the ocular artery accurately reaching the blocked position of the retinal artery. Perhaps it is possible. But if the thrombolytic drugs are feasible, why do you have this interventional surgery? It is like taking the whole body vein directly.

As a big shot in the industry, Dr. Hu's ophthalmologist is aware of the foundation of these surgeries and will not deceive Dr. Hu's colleagues. After preliminary examination, it is determined that the possibility of Dr. Hu's emboli is very high at the end, and it is probably impossible to do a thrombus stent.

Any surgery is risky.

People have done research abroad for a long time, and the difference between the treatment effects of intravenous thrombolysis and interventional local thrombolysis is indifferent. This is the first and second, the risk of this interventional surgery in ophthalmology is very high, and the incidence of adverse events is tens of percent higher than that of intravenous thrombolysis.

This interventional surgery in ophthalmology is not done by an ophthalmologist, but by an ophthalmologist on site, and an internal medicine interventionist is required to do it. From the above incidence of surgical deterioration, it can be seen that this surgery has a very high technical level for interventional surgeons.

Think about it, domestic interventional surgery has been catching up with foreign countries. The training of interventional surgeons can be said to have not met foreign standards. There are very few ophthalmic interventional skills in real life. Others have done this kind of foreign experts, and there are very few experts and doctors who want to find such guaranteed experts in China. What's more, Dr. Hu is an extremely rare binocular attack, not monocular, and the risk of interventional surgery is higher.

Finally, Dr. Hu's previous intravenous thrombolysis treatment effect proved that it was correct not to undergo interventional surgery. Because Dr. Hu's emboli in the central retinal artery blood vessels cannot be completely dissolved by thrombolytic drugs. It means that the local thrombolysis risk of your interventional surgery is high and is also useless.

After hearing the doctor's words, Mr. Liu lowered his head, indicating that the information he asked for his wife was invalid.

If you are not an insider, the fragmented information you hear about must be biased, which is normal.

Maybe his wife, Dr. Hu, had almost given up because she had known this.

Mr. Liu was full of sorrow and asked the doctor earnestly: "Last night, many doctors suggested that I come to you, Dr. Cao. Are you incompetent to my wife's disease? In fact, I didn't understand what their doctor said last night. Is there any way to find a way to find a nerve in ophthalmology?"
Chapter completed!